How do you live? – Genzaburo Yoshino

It has been some years since I last wrote any reviews. I still read plenty of stuff, mostly on my phone though, when I am on the bus, rushing off to somewhere. It seemed that I would only read a book properly when I am not engaged in any full-time job. Such is my life.

This book is again a present, and I am once more grateful for the people in my life, who would from time to time send me good reads. It is a very simple book; timeless and full of little life lessons that one can easily dismiss or ponder over. Being me, I tend to stop reading after one chapter and think about how it relates to me and the value I can take away.

The first chapter starts off with the idea that as humans in the universe, we are like molecules connected to each other in one big ocean. As children, to make sense of things, we have to use ourselves as a reference point, such as distance from “my house” or “my mother’s friend“. As we grow older, we should be able to move away from “ourselves” and use generic references. Failure to do so will result in us growing into self-centered adults who will never be able to see things as a big picture.

As part of the growing up process, we get bombarded with standard notions of what we should be, and what we should not be. The next chapter reminds us to attend to things that we feel deeply in our heart, and that we should live our lives based on our own experiences and build up our own values from there. We should not simply live as a “good person” based on others’ expectations. We need to feel.

In order to feel for ourselves, we need to be hungry for knowledge, and to be curious to explore. The next chapter had me confused for a while. The concept of questioning a seemingly self-evident thing will eventually lead to something one can no longer call self-evident, is a concept that I am not familiar with. Back then, adults were not that patient with me and to be fair, they had their share of worries and concerns. I was mostly taught to accept things as they were and not to question that much. Sometimes I do wonder, how I would turn out now, if there were proper mentors in my childhood? For now, I need to make effort to be conscious and to question things deliberately. Curiosity does not really come naturally enough for me. This chapter also ties back to the first chapter about humans being connected to each other. Through the relations of production, despite being strangers, we are all connected to one worldwide network, based on the things we need and use. So really, we are never alone.

The basic connection we have in the relations of production is one that is between a producer and a consumer. Some people are both. Guilty to say, I am an expert consumer and since reading this book, I have been wondering what I can produce to give back to this network. What, and how can I contribute? Contribution can be big or small; big enough to leave its mark in history or just small to impact people around me in this lifetime. Historic names like Napoleon leave their marks as they charge right at things that are painful and difficult, break through to the other side and take pleasure in it. In the long stream of human history, how will each of us bear up? Will we simply float along lazily or swim with might to our destination? What can each of us create to bring value to human advancement?

Fear is one of the greatest emotions that make us do brave or stupid things. It is far greater than we think, and it controls us much more than we can ever imagine. For a child, an action done out of fear could lead to a lifetime of regret. I wish for all children to have a chance to redeem themselves and not lead a lifetime carrying that kind of guilt and remorse. Life is such that sometimes regret is formed in that moment of lost opportunity. You know you cannot change anything anymore once that moment has passed. What we can do is to be brave to face up to it afterwards. Easier said than done, for sure. That is why it is a brave act, one that requires plenty of courage to deal with the pain that comes with it. But it is this pain that will make us a better person, for now we know better to grab tight and hold on to “that moment”.

How does the story end? I leave it to you to find out. 🙂

Standard

Brave New World – Aldous Huxley

A delightful read, despite all that grim. Having listened to the audio version by Michael York, I could almost see the entire story unfolding in the form of a sci-fi movie, depicted as an alien race, rather than a human one. Conditioning of each individual is done absurdly, from the time before one is born, to the moment one breathes his last. An ideal society for the ruling power but a horrific one for the individual mind. 

Ignorance is bliss, and indeed very much so in this book, for everyone is so well conditioned that each one enjoys what he can do and never asks for what he cannot. Everyone belongs to everyone and simply sleeps around with anyone as a norm of the “civilised” society.  Passion, art and science are all sacrificed for the “greater good”, for the stability of society. There is hardly any emotional attachment of any sort, for all are born out of bottles with no parents. There is no knowledge of time limitation for no one grows old (in appearance). There is no notion of pain for no one gets sick. One simply drifts through the entire life in a happy and contended mode. 

For those who are somehow more self-conscious and can see through the conditioning, they are sent to an island so that they do not pollute the masses. Or for that particular one who is not allowed to go, he tries hard to live in solitude but when the “civilised” beings continue to harass him, he goes berserk and ….

To think deeply is to suffer … to understand fully sets one apart. A loner, one will always be. 

Standard

Range: How Generalists Triumph in a Specialised World – David Epstein

Finally, not a classic nor an old book. This caught my attention after i read the summary from Blinkist. Love this book! It makes so much sense. Do read it if you have time.

It starts off explaining why the majority of people generally feel that one needs to be a master of “something” in order to be successful in life. Examples used to back up successful stories that originated from early specialisation include the Tiger Woods’ story. When more of such stories are shared, it is natural to feel like a loser if one does not specialise from an early age. I recall someone telling me that if you do not know what you want to do by early 20s, the outcome is set and the game is lost.

What is lacking in such success stories is the understanding of the context (environment). In the example of chess games, the environment is kind, in the sense that success can be achieved by repeating the same set of training over time to increase the probability of obtaining a similar result with more efficiency and less time used. The environment that we are exposed to these days however, is wicked rather than kind. This is where being a “jack of all trades” can come in helpful.

When one has spent a lot of time specialising in one single thing, it can backfire and stifle the learning process. Examples cited are musicians who had meddled with at least three instruments before settling down on one, are more successful than the ones sticking to the same single instrument since day one.

True learning has to be slow and tough and is very hard to prove or justify within a short time. The knowledge is stored somewhere and then it turns up useful in unexpected ways at a later time. It reminds me of effective marketing which is hardly trackable in terms of tangibles in the short term. Good results can only be seen or felt over time. Parents should read Chapter 4 and understand what is truly beneficial for their children and choose between short term results or long term benefits.

People always say “think outside the box” but how can anyone think outside the box if all your life you have been specialising in the same box? We don’t really know what we don’t know, right? Innovations are born out of applying a/an known/old knowledge in unimaginable areas. How can it be possible to crisscross ideas if one stays as a master of a single domain and knows little about other stuff? The exposure is essential. Trials and errors are necessary.

There is nothing wrong in being a master, just that it would not make sense to stay in the same path for the sake of staying. “Winners never quit and quitters never win”. One can never be a winner if there is always tendency to quit on a bad day. But what if one quits to pursue a better road? Is that really a loser? To have courage to start zero on unfamiliar ground?

In order to become better versions of ourselves, we may need to experiment with different things, drop the usual tools and step out of the box (specialisation). Never mind if the world does not understand. The learning is yours and yours alone.

One sentence of advice from this book: Don’t feel behind as all life is an experiment.

Standard

Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking – Malcolm Gladwell

A timeless book – a book that one can always read again at any time.

I must say i really like the idea of improv. It is a form of live theatre in which the plot, characters and dialogue of a game, scene or story are made up in the moment. (Doesn’t this sound like life itself?) Improv is only possible when the actors and actresses follow a set of rules, and are already well trained. Otherwise, the drama falls apart.

The point here – i think – is to be aware of your subconscious which is working very closely with prejudices that may be unknown to the conscious. It is only when one is well trained enough to admit and understand the existing prejudices, one can educate the conscious to isolate these prejudices so as not to cloud the first instinct that will lead to an incorrect judgement of the situation, or a poor decision made in the face of pressure. What i am referring to here, is the kind of impression received, reaction given, or decision made, without the luxury of time and deliberation. This is exactly what the actors and actresses in an improv need to do – react immediately without a script and keep the drama going.

There are many case studies in the book, which can get a little dry and “technical” for some, but I just BLINK more times and read them all anyway. Some case studies show that the accuracy of the first instinct at the moment – coupled with adequate training and sufficient experience – far surpasses the results of data analysis over a period of time.

To become better versions of ourselves, we could train up the first instinct so that when time is removed from the equation, we can still make the best out of the situation.

~11/03/19

 

Standard

Persuasion – Jane Austen

A very delightful read! If anyone is in need of a light-hearted love story, give this a try, but do have patience for the long windedness and the so very long sentences.

My first Jane Austen read. Yes, i got through my Victorian exam with dramas, poetry and only one novel. Not proud of it – my lecturer would have been very mortified indeed, at the fact that i had never read a single Jane Austen then; he was such a fan – but it was all that i could managed at that point.

Anyway, back to the book, the strong streak of can-die-but-cannot-lose-face mentality throughout the book is a great amusement in itself, for the people lose much more “face” in attempting to preserve it. The silliness of it all! Yet they appear not to know it. The idiots.

The love story – with its little acts of anger, jealousy and pride – has very little surprises but yet the expected ending does provide much satisfaction to me. I like it when the characters are flustered at the unexpected sight of each other. I like it more when the characters try so hard to be in view of each other and then try even harder to act nonchalant. A battle of poker faces, i would think.

In an era where people write letters and travel in carriages, it takes a great deal of effort just to get near a person. Naturally, when one finally gets to see or talk to the person, due attention and sincere affection are given. And hence, the mutual attraction. Lovely!

~31/08/17

Standard